Studies found: 1

The hypothesis that there are differences in decompression risk between He and H2 was examined in 1,607 unanesthetized male albino rats subjected to dives on 2% O2-balance He or 2% O2-balance H2 (depths < or = 50 ATA, bottom times < or = 60 min). The animals were decompressed to 10.8 ATA with profiles varying from rapid to slow, with up to four decompression stops of up to 60 min each. Maximum likelihood analysis was used to estimate the relative decompression risk on a per unit pressure basis (termed 'potency') and the rate of gas uptake and elimination, both factors affecting the decompression sickness risk, from a specific dive profile. H2 potency for causing decompression sickness was found to be up to 35% greater than that for He. Uptake rates were unresolvable between the two gases with the time constant (TC) estimated at approximately 2-3 min, leading to saturation in both cases in < 15 min. Washout of both gases was significantly slower than uptake, with He washout (TC approximately 1.5-3 h) substantially slower than H2 washout (TC approximately 0.5 h). It is unknown whether the decompression advantage of the faster washout of H2 or the disadvantage of its increased potency, observed in the rat, would be important for human diving.


Mehr lesen: https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1997.82.3.892

Conventional membranes

M

No complete elimination over the entire service life

M

Short shelf life, usually only one year

M

High waste water ratio of 1:2 to 1:4 liters

M

Susceptible to high particle and coating loads, which reduces service life

M

No patented technology and mostly mass-produced goods

Evodrop Membrane

N

99.9% effective filtration without reduction

N

Maintenance after 10,000 liters or after 5 years at the latest

N

Low wastewater ratio of 1:1

N

Integrated surface structure minimizes the adhesion of particles and deposits

N

Protected Membrane Process (Orbital Osmosis®)

Evodrop uses the IP2Location LITE database for IP geolocation .